Exploring the social and economic consequences of the metaverse: a multi-criteria approach to the SDGs
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3846/tede.2025.24858Abstract
This study explores the social implications of the Metaverse, a transformative digital ecosystem, through the lens of the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). The research identifies fourteen key concerns associated with the adoption of Metaverse technologies and assesses their societal impact. A two-stage methodology was employed: an expert panel utilized Grey Step-wise Weight Assessment Ratio Analysis (SWARA) and Grey Combined Compromise Solution (CoCoSo) to assign relative weights and to rank these concerns, reflecting their significance in societal contexts. Following this, an international survey was conducted to quantitatively gauge public perspectives across diverse demographics. Key findings highlight substantial psychological impacts linked to immersive experiences, such as addiction and mental health challenges, which pose a threat to SDG 3 (Good Health and Well-being). The environmental sustainability of Metaverse technologies is also critically examined, stressing the urgent need for green practices to mitigate carbon emissions and reduce energy consumption. Furthermore, ethical issues, particularly surrounding data privacy and user consent, are discussed, emphasizing the importance of robust regulatory frameworks to ensure safe and equitable user experiences. The study reveals the Metaverse’s potential to both foster global connectivity and exacerbate existing social inequalities, advocating for balanced, inclusive approaches to ensure equitable access. By integrating expert insights with broad public opinions, this research provides a comprehensive analysis of the complex relationship between digital technology and societal well-being, offering a foundation for future exploration of the responsible evolution of the Metaverse.
Keywords:
Metaverse social impact, SDGs, virtual environment governance, technological equity, MCDM, grey SWARA, grey CoCoSo, social concernsHow to Cite
Share
License
Copyright (c) 2025 The Author(s). Published by Vilnius Gediminas Technical University.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
References
Addai, G., Amegavi, G. B., & Robinson, G. M. (2024). Advancing environmental sustainability: The dynamic relationship between renewable energy, institutional quality, and ecological footprint in the N‐11 countries. Sustainable Development, 32(6), 7397–7408. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.3096
Allam, Z., Sharifi, A., Bibri, S. E., Jones, D. S., & Krogstie, J. (2022). The Metaverse as a virtual form of smart cities: Opportunities and challenges for environmental, economic, and social sustainability in urban futures. Smart Cities, 5(3), 771–801. https://doi.org/10.3390/smartcities5030040
Badi, I., & Pamucar, D. (2020). Supplier selection for steelmaking company by using combined Grey-MARCOS methods. Decision Making: Applications in Management and Engineering, 3(2), 37–48. https://doi.org/10.31181/dmame2003037b
Bardawil, N. (2021). No country has jurisdiction over the metaverse (yet). BSA Law. Retrieved October 10, 2024, from https://www.bsalaw.com/insight/no-country-has-jurisdiction-over-the-metaverse-yet/
Benosman, M. (2023). Social psychology in the era of the Metaverse: An overview of recent studies. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/rpw5s
Bibri, S. E. (2022). The social shaping of the metaverse as an alternative to the imaginaries of data-driven smart cities: A study in science, technology, and society. Smart Cities, 5(3), 832–874. https://doi.org/10.3390/smartcities5030043
Bojic, L. (2022). Metaverse through the prism of power and addiction: What will happen when the virtual world becomes more attractive than reality? European Journal of Futures Research, 10(1), Article 22. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40309-022-00208-4
Bokinni, Y. (2022, April 25). A barrage of assault, racism and rape jokes: My nightmare trip into the metaverse. The Guardian.
Canny, W. (2022). Citi sees Metaverse economy as large as $13T by 2030. Retrieved October 10, 2024, from https://www.coindesk.com/business/2022/04/01/citi-sees-metaverse-economy-as-large-as-13t-by-2030/
Cao, Q., Esangbedo, M. O., Bai, S., & Esangbedo, C. O. (2019). Grey SWARA-FUCOM weighting method for contractor selection MCDM problem: A case study of floating solar panel energy system installation. Energies, 12(13), Article 2481. https://doi.org/10.3390/en12132481
Carstensen, M. B., & Emmenegger, P. (2023). Education as social policy: New tensions in maturing knowledge economies. Social Policy and Administration, 57(2), 109–121. https://doi.org/10.1111/spol.12888
Carvalho, P., & Alves, H. (2022). Customer value co-creation in the hospitality and tourism industry: A systematic literature review. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 35(1), 250–273. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJCHM-12-2021-1528
Cheng, R., Wu, N., Chen, S., & Han, B. (2022, March 12–16). Reality check of metaverse: A first look at commercial social virtual reality platforms. In Proceedings of the 2022 IEEE Conference on Virtual Reality and 3D User Interfaces Abstracts and Workshops (VRW) (pp. 141–148). Christchurch, New Zealand. IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/VRW55335.2022.00040
Combe, T., Fribourg, R., Detto, L., & Normand, J.-M. (2024). Exploring the influence of virtual avatar heads in mixed reality on social presence, performance and user experience in collaborative tasks. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 30(5), 2206–2216. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2024.3372051
Cratsley, K., & Mackey, T. K. (2018). Health policy brief: Global mental health and the United Nations’ sustainable development goals. Families Systems & Health, 36(2), 225–229. https://doi.org/10.1037/fsh0000329
Cruz, M., & Oliveira, A. (2024). Where are we now? – Exploring the Metaverse representations to find digital twins. Electronics, 13(10), Article 1984. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics13101984
De Giovanni, P. (2023). Sustainability of the Metaverse: A transition to Industry 5.0. Sustainability, 15(7), Article 6079. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15076079
Dincelli, E., & Yayla, A. (2022). Immersive virtual reality in the age of the Metaverse: A hybrid-narrative review based on the technology affordance perspective. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 31(2), Article 101717. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsis.2022.101717
Dwivedi, Y. K., Kshetri, N., Hughes, L., Rana, N. P., Baabdullah, A. M., Kar, A. K., Koohang, A., Ribeiro‐Navarrete, S., Belei, N., Balakrishnan, J., Basu, S., Behl, A., Davies, G. H., Dutot, V., Dwivedi, R., Evans, L., Felix, R., Foster-Fletcher, R., Giannakis, M.,…Yan, M. (2023). Exploring the darkverse: A multi-perspective analysis of the negative societal impacts of the Metaverse. Information Systems Frontiers, 25(5), 2071–2114. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-023-10400-x
Elmansouri, O., Alossta, A., & Badi, I. (2022). Pavement condition assessment using pavement condition index and multi-criteria decision-making model. Mechatronics and Intelligent Transportation Systems, 1(1), 57–68. https://doi.org/10.56578/mits010107
Ezra, A. (2021, May 3). Renewable energy alone can’t address data centers’ adverse environmental impact. Forbes. https://www.forbes.com/councils/forbestechcouncil/2021/05/03/renewable-energy-alone-cant-address-data-centers-adverse-environmental-impact/
Feng, X., Wang, X., & Su, Y. (2022). An analysis of the current status of metaverse research based on bibliometrics. Library Hi Tech, 42(1), 284–308. https://doi.org/10.1108/lht-10-2022-0467
Garg, C. P. (2021). Modeling the e-waste mitigation strategies using Grey-theory and DEMATEL framework. Journal of Cleaner Production, 281, Article 124035. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.124035
Go, H., & Kang, M. H. (2022). Metaverse tourism for sustainable tourism development: Tourism agenda 2030. Tourism Review, 78(2), 381–394. https://doi.org/10.1108/TR-02-2022-0102
Henz, P. (2022). The societal impact of the Metaverse. Discover Artificial Intelligence, 2, Article 19. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44163-022-00032-6
Hollensen, S., Kotler, P., & Opresnik, M. O. (2023). Metaverse – the new marketing universe. Journal of Business Strategy, 44(3), 119–125. https://doi.org/10.1108/JBS-01-2022-0014
Hurst, W., Spyrou, O., Teki̇nerdoğan, B., & Krampe, C. (2023). Digital Art and the Metaverse: Benefits and challenges. Future Internet, 15(6), Article 188. https://doi.org/10.3390/fi15060188
Hussain, Z., Khan, A., & Ali, A. (2023). The impact of user-generated content, social interactions and virtual economies on Metaverse environments. Journal of Sustainable Economics, 1(2), 34–44. https://doi.org/10.32734/jse.v1i2.13798
Ioannidis, S., & Kontis, A. P. (2023). The 4 epochs of the Metaverse. Journal of Metaverse, 3(2), 152–165. https://doi.org/10.57019/jmv.1294970
Jamshidi, M., Serej, A. D., Jamshidi, A., & Moztarzadeh, O. (2023). The Meta-Metaverse: Ideation and future directions. Future Internet, 15(8), Article 252. https://doi.org/10.3390/fi15080252
Keršulienė, V., Zavadskas, E. K., & Turskis, Z. (2010). Selection of rational dispute resolution method by applying new step‐wise weight assessment ratio analysis (SWARA). Journal of Business Economics and Management, 11(2), 243–258. https://doi.org/10.3846/jbem.2010.12
Kouroupi, N., & Metaxas, T. (2023). Can the Metaverse and its associated digital tools and technologies provide an opportunity for destinations to address the vulnerability of overtourism? Tourism and Hospitality, 4(2), 355–373. https://doi.org/10.3390/tourhosp4020022
Lanigan, R. (2024). Digital Coercive Control (DCC): The role of platforms in victims’(In) justice and potential for online dispute resolution. Pepperdine Dispute Resolution Law Journal, 24(1), 328–361.
Lee, J., Lee, T. S., Lee, S., Jang, J., Yoo, S., Choi, Y., & Park, Y. R. (2022). Development and application of a metaverse-based social skills training program for children with autism spectrum disorder to improve social interaction: Protocol for a randomized controlled trial. JMIR Research Protocols, 11(6), Article e35960. https://doi.org/10.2196/35960
Lee, M., & Chaney, D. (2023). The psychological and functional factors driving metaverse resistance. Internet Research, 34(1), 195–215. https://doi.org/10.1108/INTR-08-2022-0647
Lu, S., & Mintz, O. (2023). Marketing on the metaverse: Research opportunities and challenges. AMS Review, 13, 151–166. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13162-023-00255-5
Macionis, J. J., & Plummer, K. (2005). Sociology: A global introduction. Pearson Education.
Marković-Blagojević, M., Radić, N., & Cvjetković, M. (2024). Metaverse: Technological evolution and social impact. Trendovi U Poslovanju, 12(1), 20–26. https://doi.org/10.5937/trendpos2401019M
Mokhtar, K. S., Rahman, N. A., & Haron, M. S. (2020). Complying with the United Nations’ Sustainable Development Goals: A case of the Malaysian ageing population. Gatr Global Journal of Business Social Sciences Review, 8(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.35609/gjbssr.2020.8.1(1)
Mosco, V. (2004). The digital sublime: Myth, power, and cyberspace. Mit Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/2433.001.0001
Mosco, V. (2023). Into the Metaverse: Technical challenges, social problems, Utopian visions, and policy principles. Javnost – The Public, 161–173. https://doi.org/10.1080/13183222.2023.2200688
Mou, Y., Ma, Y., Guo, D., & Ding, Z. (2024). Effect of platform gamification rewards on user stickiness. Management Decision, 63(3), 824–849. https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-09-2023-1688
Oh, H. J., Kim, J., Chang, J. J., Park, N., & Lee, S. (2023). Social benefits of living in the metaverse: The relationships among social presence, supportive interaction, social self-efficacy, and feelings of loneliness. Computers in Human Behavior, 139, Article 107498. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2022.107498
Othman, A., Chemnad, K., Hassanien, A. E., Tlili, A., Zhang, C. Y., Al-Thani, D., Altınay, F., Chalghoumi, H., Al‐Khalifa, H. S., Obeid, M., Jemni, M., Al-Hadhrami, T., & Altınay, Z. (2024). Accessible Metaverse: A theoretical framework for accessibility and inclusion in the Metaverse. Multimodal Technologies and Interaction, 8(3), Article 21. https://doi.org/10.3390/mti8030021
Owen, M. (2022). Between utopia and disaster: The metaverse and the dream of a world that can be controlled. Retrieved October 9, 2024, from https://hedgehogreview.com/issues/political-mythologies/articles/between-utopia-and-disaster
Pellegrino, A., Wang, R., & Stasi, A. (2023). Exploring the intersection of sustainable consumption and the Metaverse: A review of current literature and future research directions. Heliyon, 9(9), Article e19190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e19190
Prados-Castillo, J. F., Torrecilla-García, J. A., & Liébana‐Cabanillas, F. (2024). Metaverse as a booster of tourism transformation towards virtual management strategies. Tourism Review. https://doi.org/10.1108/TR-10-2023-0750
Radanliev, P., De Roure, D., Novitzky, P., & Sluganovic, I. (2024). Accessibility and inclusiveness of new information and communication technologies for disabled users and content creators in the Metaverse. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology, 19(5), 1849–1863. https://doi.org/10.1080/17483107.2023.2241882
Rajguru, K., & Brüggemann, P. (2024). Sustainability meets metaverse: A conceptual framework of sustainable dimensions of the metaverse. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 23(5), 2720–2729. https://doi.org/10.1002/cb.2368
Sánchez-Adame, L. M., Monroy-Rodríguez, G., Mendoza, S., Decouchant, D., & Mateos-Papis, A. P. (2023). Framework for ethically designed microtransactions in the Metaverse. IEEE Access, 11, 140687–140700. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2023.3341057
Scaini, A., Scaini, C., Frentress, J., Destouni, G., & Manzoni, S. (2021). Linking the 2030 agenda for sustainable development to research, newspapers, and governance: The case of the last free-flowing Alpine river. Frontiers in Environmental Science, 9, Article 553822. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2021.553822
Seigneur, J.-M., & Choukou, M.-A. (2022). How should metaverse augment humans with disabilities? 13th Augmented Human International Conference, Article 7. https://doi.org/10.1145/3532525.3532534
Stephenson, N. (1992). Snow crash. Bantam Books.
Thakral, P., Srivastava, P. R., Dash, S. S., Jasimuddin, S. M., & Zhang, Z. (2023). Trends in the thematic landscape of HR analytics research: A structural topic modeling approach. Management Decision, 61(12), 3665–3690. https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-01-2023-0080
United Nations. (2015). Transforming our world: The 2030 agenda for sustainable development. https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/post2015/transformingourworld/publication
Usmani, S. S., Sharath, M., & Mehendale, M. (2022). Future of mental health in the metaverse. General Psychiatry, 35(4), Article e100825. https://doi.org/10.1136/gpsych-2022-100825
Vlăduţescu, Ş., & Stănescu, G. C. (2023). Environmental sustainability of metaverse: Perspectives from Romanian developers. Sustainability, 15(15), Article 11704. https://doi.org/10.3390/su151511704
Walther, C. C. (2024). WHY: Perspective: POZE – A multidisciplinary framework of life. In Human leadership for humane technology: The new AI: Agency ignited (pp. 1–101). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-67823-3_1
Wang, Y., Su, Z., Zhang, N., Xing, R., Liu, D., Luan, T. H., & Shen, X. (2022). A survey on metaverse: Fundamentals, security, and privacy. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, 25(1), 319–352. https://doi.org/10.36227/techrxiv.19255058.v3
Wani, N. S. (2023). Sustainable marketing in line with SDGs: An extensive bibliometric analysis. International Journal of Research and Review, 10(1), 315–323. https://doi.org/10.52403/ijrr.20230134
Wynn, M., & Jones, P. (2023). New technology deployment and corporate responsibilities in the metaverse. Knowledge, 3(4), 543–556. https://doi.org/10.3390/knowledge3040035
Yazdani, M., Zarate, P., Zavadskas, E. K., & Turskis, Z. (2019a). A combined compromise solution (CoCoSo) method for multi-criteria decision-making problems. Management Decision, 57(9), 2501–2519. https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-05-2017-0458
Yazdani, M., Wen, Z., Liao, H., Banaitis, A., & Turskis, Z. (2019b). A grey combined compromise solution (CoCoSo-G) method for supplier selection in construction management. Journal of Civil Engineering and Management, 25(8), 858–874. https://doi.org/10.3846/jcem.2019.11309
Yong, S. (2022). If the future is the metaverse, why are we so obsessed with nostalgic beauty? Retrieved October 5, 2024, from https://www.refinery29.com/en-us/nostalgic-beauty-in-the-metaverse
Zaky, Y. A. M., & Gameil, A. A. (2024). Exploring the use of avatars in the sustainable edu-metaverse for an alternative assessment: Impact on tolerance. Sustainability, 16(15), Article 6604. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16156604
Zhang, G., Cao, J., Liu, D., & Qi, J. (2022). Popularity of the metaverse: Embodied social presence theory perspective. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, Article 997751. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.997751
Zhao, N., & You, F. (2023). The growing metaverse sector can reduce greenhouse gas emissions by 10 Gt CO2e in the United States by 2050. Energy & Environmental Science, 16(6), 2382–2397. https://doi.org/10.1039/D3EE00081H
View article in other formats
CrossMark check
Published
Issue
Section
Copyright
Copyright (c) 2025 The Author(s). Published by Vilnius Gediminas Technical University.
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.